Repossessed property not undervalued
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; 1995 EGCS 144(1) (14 October 1995)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: In "Minah v Bank of Ireland" QBD 3 October 1995 it was decided that the Bank did not err in selling property for £39,000, in employing two estate agents or clearing the property ; plaintiff alleges property was undervalued, fees paid to two estate agents were unjustified, and he had suffered loss of personal effects.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3139-42 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 2901-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
In "Minah v Bank of Ireland" QBD 3 October 1995 it was decided that the Bank did not err in selling property for £39,000, in employing two estate agents or clearing the property ; plaintiff alleges property was undervalued, fees paid to two estate agents were unjustified, and he had suffered loss of personal effects.