Landlords` occupation of premises
Language: English Series: EGCS ; (1989) 144Publication details: 1989Subject(s): Summary: Meyer v Riddick and others . CA 24 October 1989. The landlords, refusing to grant a new lease on a business tenancy , were not intending to occupy the premises as beneficeries under the trust but under a lease to a firm, where two of the respondent landlords worked, therby not satisfying Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s41(2) para (g) .| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2544-14 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 26703-1001 |
Meyer v Riddick and others . CA 24 October 1989. The landlords, refusing to grant a new lease on a business tenancy , were not intending to occupy the premises as beneficeries under the trust but under a lease to a firm, where two of the respondent landlords worked, therby not satisfying Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s41(2) para (g) .