Possession action
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; 1991 EGCS 98 (26 October 1991)Publication details: 1991Subject(s): Summary: "Land v Sykes and another" CA 11 October 1991, an appeal by defendant tenant`s executors over validity of Case E and Case G notices to quit. Landlord argued that following S`s death, the Case G notice had ended the executors right to possession. On the other hand, the executors who had continued paying rent, argued that a Case E notice was valid and that the tenancy had been terminated and that they enjoyed a right to possession with the protection of the Agricultural Holdings Act 1986. Appeal dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2742-37 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 27677-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
"Land v Sykes and another" CA 11 October 1991, an appeal by defendant tenant`s executors over validity of Case E and Case G notices to quit. Landlord argued that following S`s death, the Case G notice had ended the executors right to possession. On the other hand, the executors who had continued paying rent, argued that a Case E notice was valid and that the tenancy had been terminated and that they enjoyed a right to possession with the protection of the Agricultural Holdings Act 1986. Appeal dismissed.