Royton Industries Ltd v Lawrence
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1994) 20 EG 151-153(3)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: ChD 17 February 1994. The defendant (L) had been a tenant of R but had assigned the lease. In contesting a service charge L claimed that, by the terms of the covenant, their liability ceased when the tenancy was assigned. Deciding for R, "held" that the privity of contract principle and the lease terms `yielding and paying` bound L to pay to sum charged.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS50686 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 3181-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
ChD 17 February 1994. The defendant (L) had been a tenant of R but had assigned the lease. In contesting a service charge L claimed that, by the terms of the covenant, their liability ceased when the tenancy was assigned. Deciding for R, "held" that the privity of contract principle and the lease terms `yielding and paying` bound L to pay to sum charged.