Fairfield-Mabey Ltd v Shell UK Ltd
Language: English Series: Construction Industry Law Letter ; 514-517(4)Subject(s): Summary: ORC 7 June 1989. The plaintiff (F) claim ed payments under the fast track contract they had with the defendants (S). S counterclaimed for costs incurred in transferring work to another company as F fell behind schedule. A third party, subcontractors to F, claimed an indemnity against the counterclaim. A settlement was reached between F and S as both parties realised that to continue action was uneconomic.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS41221 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 28924-1001 |
ORC 7 June 1989. The plaintiff (F) claim ed payments under the fast track contract they had with the defendants (S). S counterclaimed for costs incurred in transferring work to another company as F fell behind schedule. A third party, subcontractors to F, claimed an indemnity against the counterclaim. A settlement was reached between F and S as both parties realised that to continue action was uneconomic.