Conservation area
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; (1995) EGCS 120(1) (8/7/95)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: "R v Surrey CC, ex parte Oakimber Ltd" 27 June 1995. The applicant challenged the CC`s designation of a large area as a conservation area. Held that planning authorities were not expected to only designate a parcel of land, on which there was a building or some historic interest to protect but could consider the whole of an area.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3127-29 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 29003-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3127-23 Agricultural holdings arbitration | WB3127-24 Rent review arbitration | WB3127-25 Rent review of casino | WB3127-29 Conservation area | WB3127-30 Telecommunications | WB3128-07 Duty of care | WB3128-15 Vacant property |
"R v Surrey CC, ex parte Oakimber Ltd" 27 June 1995. The applicant challenged the CC`s designation of a large area as a conservation area. Held that planning authorities were not expected to only designate a parcel of land, on which there was a building or some historic interest to protect but could consider the whole of an area.