Telecommunications
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; (1995) EGCS 121(1) (8/7/95))Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: "Tandridge DC v Telecom Securicor Cellular Radio Ltd" QBD 27 June 1995. Their first telecommunications planning application with requisite fee having been refused, the defendants submitted drawings of a new site but without a fee and written description and without calling it an application. On the expiry of the 28-day notice period, they maintained they had deemed approval. The plaintiffs claim, that the second application was not valid was upheld.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3127-30 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 29011-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3127-24 Rent review arbitration | WB3127-25 Rent review of casino | WB3127-29 Conservation area | WB3127-30 Telecommunications | WB3128-07 Duty of care | WB3128-15 Vacant property | WB3128-34 Notice must be served on the day |
"Tandridge DC v Telecom Securicor Cellular Radio Ltd" QBD 27 June 1995. Their first telecommunications planning application with requisite fee having been refused, the defendants submitted drawings of a new site but without a fee and written description and without calling it an application. On the expiry of the 28-day notice period, they maintained they had deemed approval. The plaintiffs claim, that the second application was not valid was upheld.