Hindcastle Ltd v Barbara Attenborough
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; [1996] 15 EG 103-110(8)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: HL 22 February 1996. See ABS54763 (WLR) and ABS51781 (for CA decision). Upheld the decision of the CA that second defendant and their guarantor were liable to pay rent arrears incurred when the company to whom the premises were assigned in 1989 went into liquidation in 1992. The lease had been assigned to the second defendant in 1987, they argued that they had determined the lease in 1989.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X3314 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 29725-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
HL 22 February 1996. See ABS54763 (WLR) and ABS51781 (for CA decision). Upheld the decision of the CA that second defendant and their guarantor were liable to pay rent arrears incurred when the company to whom the premises were assigned in 1989 went into liquidation in 1992. The lease had been assigned to the second defendant in 1987, they argued that they had determined the lease in 1989.