Covenant to keep a shop open
Language: English Series: New Law Journal ; 139(6341) 10 November 1989, 1529-1541(3)Publication details: 1989Subject(s): Summary: This article considers, with reference to two particular cases F W Woolworth PLC v Charlwood Alliance Properties Ltd (See Abstract 37703) and Braddon Towers v International Stores Ltd (1987) 1 EGLR 207, that if a tenant under a covenant to trade at the demised premises ceases to do so, but asks for the landlord `s consent to an assignment to someone who also has not the intention or the ability to trade, can the landlord`s consent be reasonably withheld.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS41701 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 31851-1001 |
This article considers, with reference to two particular cases F W Woolworth PLC v Charlwood Alliance Properties Ltd (See Abstract 37703) and Braddon Towers v International Stores Ltd (1987) 1 EGLR 207, that if a tenant under a covenant to trade at the demised premises ceases to do so, but asks for the landlord `s consent to an assignment to someone who also has not the intention or the ability to trade, can the landlord`s consent be reasonably withheld.