Tyack v SoS for the Environment
Language: English Series: Weekly Law Reports ; (1989) 1 WLR 1392-1398(7)Publication details: 1989Subject(s): Summary: HL 7 December 1989. The appellant`s barn within the curtilage of his house was under an enforcement notice for demolition as it was not on agricultural land within article 3 Town and Country Planning General Development Order 1977 Class VI . The appeal that the adjoining plot separated from the house and curtilage by a farm track owned by a third party, was still an agricultural unit, thereby complying with the minimum area required for development, was dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS41889 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 33287-1001 |
HL 7 December 1989. The appellant`s barn within the curtilage of his house was under an enforcement notice for demolition as it was not on agricultural land within article 3 Town and Country Planning General Development Order 1977 Class VI . The appeal that the adjoining plot separated from the house and curtilage by a farm track owned by a third party, was still an agricultural unit, thereby complying with the minimum area required for development, was dismissed.