Tomlin v Westminister City Council
Language: English Series: Rating Appeals ; 1990 RA 79-91(7)Publication details: 1990Subject(s): Summary: CA 20 June 1989. The appellant (T) occupied what used to be the Cambodian Embassy but had not paid rates . At issue was whether T was in fact in rateable occupation . The CA found that T was in rateable occupation. He was squatting on the premises with people and liability for rates could be enforced against any of them if each was in occupation of all the premises and not just part of it.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS42597 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 37772-1001 |
CA 20 June 1989. The appellant (T) occupied what used to be the Cambodian Embassy but had not paid rates . At issue was whether T was in fact in rateable occupation . The CA found that T was in rateable occupation. He was squatting on the premises with people and liability for rates could be enforced against any of them if each was in occupation of all the premises and not just part of it.