Disturbance compensation
Language: English Series: EGCS ; (1989) 152Publication details: 1989Subject(s): Summary: Hughes and another v Doncaster MBC CA 10 November 1989. It was held that the respondents` claim for disturbance was not invalidated by compensation under Land Compensation Act 1971 s5 rule 4 for the value of the land but that development immune from enforcement under the Town and Country Planning Act 1971 was "contrary to law" for rule (4).| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2546-09 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 4135-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Hughes and another v Doncaster MBC CA 10 November 1989. It was held that the respondents` claim for disturbance was not invalidated by compensation under Land Compensation Act 1971 s5 rule 4 for the value of the land but that development immune from enforcement under the Town and Country Planning Act 1971 was "contrary to law" for rule (4).