Dwelling not a house
Language: English Series: Times ; 17 November 1994, 32(1)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: In "Duke of Westminster and others v Birrane", CA 10 November 1994, it was held that a leasehold mews property converted to incorporate a basement area that lay beneath the rear part of an adjoining property was not a `house` for the purposes of enfranchisement under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3043-37 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 4179-1001 |
In "Duke of Westminster and others v Birrane", CA 10 November 1994, it was held that a leasehold mews property converted to incorporate a basement area that lay beneath the rear part of an adjoining property was not a `house` for the purposes of enfranchisement under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.