Sunday trading ban
Language: English Series: Times ; 1 April 1993, 38 | Financial Times ; 1 April 1993, 11(2)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: In "Stoke on Trent CC v B & Q plc" and "Norwich CC v b & Q plc", HL 31 March 1993, it was held that Article 30 of the EEC Treaty was to be interpreted as meaning that the prohibition that it laid down against `quanititive restrictions on imports and all measures having equivalent effect` did not apply to national legislation prohibiting retailers from opening on a Sunday.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2913-20 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 39599-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2912-48 Rent-free deal created tenancy | WB2912-58 Change of use | WB2912-59 Permitted development | WB2913-20 Sunday trading ban | WB2913-24 Breach of covenant | WB2913-25 Rent : arrears | WB2913-26 Uninsured fire losses |
In "Stoke on Trent CC v B & Q plc" and "Norwich CC v b & Q plc", HL 31 March 1993, it was held that Article 30 of the EEC Treaty was to be interpreted as meaning that the prohibition that it laid down against `quanititive restrictions on imports and all measures having equivalent effect` did not apply to national legislation prohibiting retailers from opening on a Sunday.