Unoccupied property and hardship
Language: English Series: EGCS ; 1989 75Publication details: 1989Subject(s): Summary: In Huzminor Investments Developments Ltd v City of Wakefield MDC , QBD 8 May 1989, the appeal was allowed on the grounds that the corporate veil could not be lifted; the identity of shareholders and the absence of any hardship to them was irrelevant and for the purposes of General Rate Act 1967 Sched 1 there is a definition of `hardship` in Re Windsor Securities Ltd (1978) .| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2520-26 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 41970-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2520-23 Solicitors move into mortgages | WB2520-24 Oppidan vehicle sets pace | WB2520-25 Comparison of jumbos | WB2520-26 Unoccupied property and hardship | WB2520-27 Blueprint for toll-road network | WB2520-28 White paper | WB2520-29 Space race |
In Huzminor Investments Developments Ltd v City of Wakefield MDC , QBD 8 May 1989, the appeal was allowed on the grounds that the corporate veil could not be lifted; the identity of shareholders and the absence of any hardship to them was irrelevant and for the purposes of General Rate Act 1967 Sched 1 there is a definition of `hardship` in Re Windsor Securities Ltd (1978) .