Agricultural development
Language: English Series: EGCS ; (1991) 77 (20/7/91)Publication details: 1991Subject(s): Summary: Clarke v SoS for the Environment and another QBD 5 July 1991. An inspector,hearing an appeal against an enforcement notice on an agricultural building was found to have been wrong in deciding that the building, was not necessary for a sheep farm of that size. The inspector should not have referred to the sheep farm but approached it more generally as an agricultural building for a farmer.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2729-26 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 45090-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2729-23 Outdoor advertisements control | WB2729-24 Planning permission lapsed | WB2729-25 Wind power | WB2729-26 Agricultural development | WB2729-27 Approvement of extension | WB2729-28 Not eligible for commonhold | WB2729-29 Raffling a house |
Clarke v SoS for the Environment and another QBD 5 July 1991. An inspector,hearing an appeal against an enforcement notice on an agricultural building was found to have been wrong in deciding that the building, was not necessary for a sheep farm of that size. The inspector should not have referred to the sheep farm but approached it more generally as an agricultural building for a farmer.