Land interest
Language: English Series: Times ; 10 May 1994, 31(1)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: In "Clark & another v Chief Land Registrar and another"; "Chancery plc v Ketteringham" CA 5 May 1994 it was held that registration of a caution to protect an interest in registered land merely gave the cautioner a right to be given notice of any proposed dealings. It did not entitle the cautioner to assert priority of his interest over a subsequently registered charge.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3018-37 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 47316-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3018-11 Repairs to golf club | WB3018-12 Party wall opening | WB3018-28 Ease of access | WB3018-37 Land interest | WB3019-09 Economic considerations | WB3019-29 Rectification of register | WB3019-30 Smithfield land dispute |
In "Clark & another v Chief Land Registrar and another"; "Chancery plc v Ketteringham" CA 5 May 1994 it was held that registration of a caution to protect an interest in registered land merely gave the cautioner a right to be given notice of any proposed dealings. It did not entitle the cautioner to assert priority of his interest over a subsequently registered charge.