Moore and another v Khan-Ghauri
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1991) 32 EG 63-65(3)Publication details: 1991Subject(s): Summary: CA 10 May 1991. The successful bidder at auction, who failed to complete on the property, appealed against forfeiture of his deposit and damages for breach of contract. The appellant`s claim that he had been assured before the sale that any purchase at the sale could be inspected and valued before completion was spurious. Appeal dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS44913 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 49855-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
CA 10 May 1991. The successful bidder at auction, who failed to complete on the property, appealed against forfeiture of his deposit and damages for breach of contract. The appellant`s claim that he had been assured before the sale that any purchase at the sale could be inspected and valued before completion was spurious. Appeal dismissed.