Review works both ways

By:

Millichap, D

Language: English Series: Planning (for the Natural and Built Environment) ; (929) 2 August 1991, 17(1)Publication details: 1991Subject(s):

Summary: Illustrates the courts` attitude to judicial review through discussion of two cases against planning authorities. In Attorney-General v Barrett Manchester Ltd the council wiped out a 1934 agreement not to develop private open space; a "relator" action failed. The second, Tyler v Avon CC concerned objections to broadening the green belt.

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Journal article	London Journal article	ABS45031 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	50516-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	ABS45028 Different animal emerges	ABS45029 Local planning policies, the Use Classes Order and hot food take aways	ABS45030 Planning cases in 1990	ABS45031 Review works both ways	ABS45032 The need to give reasons - but of what kind?	ABS45033 Turning the tide downriver	ABS45034 Working from home: do you need planning permission?	Next

Illustrates the courts` attitude to judicial review through discussion of two cases against planning authorities. In Attorney-General v Barrett Manchester Ltd the council wiped out a 1934 agreement not to develop private open space; a "relator" action failed. The second, Tyler v Avon CC concerned objections to broadening the green belt.

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)