Green belt
Language: English Series: EGCS ; 1990 58Publication details: 1990Subject(s): Summary: In R v SoS for the Environment and another ex parte Pehrsson , CA 26 April 1990, it was held that the inspector had failed to give adequate reasons for concluding that the proposed use was not appropriate for the green belt , failing to give consideration to the nature of the residential use sought, namely restricted to staff accommodation and is respect of which the appellant had agreed the terms of a section 52 agreement .| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2618-47 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 52224-1001 |
In R v SoS for the Environment and another ex parte Pehrsson , CA 26 April 1990, it was held that the inspector had failed to give adequate reasons for concluding that the proposed use was not appropriate for the green belt , failing to give consideration to the nature of the residential use sought, namely restricted to staff accommodation and is respect of which the appellant had agreed the terms of a section 52 agreement .