Honourable intent?

By:

Knowles, R

Language: English Series: Chartered Quantity Surveyor ; 14(3) November 1991, 8(1)Publication details: 1991Subject(s):

Summary: Stresses the importance of wording in letters of intent in terms of contractual obligation, particularly in following up claims for payment. Refers to three case law decisions: British Steel Corporation v Cleveland Bridge Ltd 1984; Kitsons Insulation Contractors Ltd v Balfour Beatty Buildings 1989 and CJ Sims Ltd v Shaftesbury plc 1991.

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Journal article	London Journal article	ABS45392 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	52677-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	ABS45389 Contracting law	ABS45390 Contracts survey	ABS45391 Guidance on prime cost sums	ABS45392 Honourable intent?	ABS45393 Price depends on why you want more	ABS45394 Variations	ABS45395 Wharf Properties v Eric Cumine Associates: the effect on rolled-up claims	Next

Stresses the importance of wording in letters of intent in terms of contractual obligation, particularly in following up claims for payment. Refers to three case law decisions: British Steel Corporation v Cleveland Bridge Ltd 1984; Kitsons Insulation Contractors Ltd v Balfour Beatty Buildings 1989 and CJ Sims Ltd v Shaftesbury plc 1991.

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)