Keeping your permission alive
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (9145) 16 November 1991, 169-194(3)Publication details: 1991Subject(s): Summary: Firstly the author discusses time limits within which permitted development must commence following planning permission laid down in Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s61-63. Secondly, consideration is given to the extent to which operations carried out in breach of planning control may amount to implementation of a planning permission, thus so preserving it. Refers to relevant case law: Kerrier DC v SOS for Environment (1980 41 P&CR 284); Clwyd CC v SOS for Wales (1982 JPL 696); Eldridge v SOS for the Environment (1984 48P&CR 35); R v Elmbridge BC ex p Oakimber Ltd (1991 3 PLR 3) and R v Elmbridge BC ex p Health Care Corporation Ltd (1991 3 PLR 63).| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS45487 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 53333-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Firstly the author discusses time limits within which permitted development must commence following planning permission laid down in Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s61-63. Secondly, consideration is given to the extent to which operations carried out in breach of planning control may amount to implementation of a planning permission, thus so preserving it. Refers to relevant case law: Kerrier DC v SOS for Environment (1980 41 P&CR 284); Clwyd CC v SOS for Wales (1982 JPL 696); Eldridge v SOS for the Environment (1984 48P&CR 35); R v Elmbridge BC ex p Oakimber Ltd (1991 3 PLR 3) and R v Elmbridge BC ex p Health Care Corporation Ltd (1991 3 PLR 63).