Interim payments
Language: English Series: Times ; 19/10/88 p44Publication details: 1988Subject(s): Summary: In Shanning International Ltd v George Wimpey International Ltd CA 8 September 1988 it was held that on an application for an interim payment , the court had first to satisfy itself that the plaintiff would succeed in obtaining judgment for a substantial sum and only then proceed to decide whether as a matter of discretion an interim payment should be ordered.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2442-16 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 54145-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2442-13 Guidance note on communications | WB2442-14 Hudson formula | WB2442-15 Arbitration Rule 6 | WB2442-16 Interim payments | WB2442-17 Assistance for tree planting | WB2442-18 Case for wind and water | WB2442-19 EEC tendering rules tightened |
In Shanning International Ltd v George Wimpey International Ltd CA 8 September 1988 it was held that on an application for an interim payment , the court had first to satisfy itself that the plaintiff would succeed in obtaining judgment for a substantial sum and only then proceed to decide whether as a matter of discretion an interim payment should be ordered.