Letter does not affect possession
Language: English Series: Times ; 29/6/88 p30Publication details: 1988Subject(s): Summary: In Mount Carmel Investments Ltd v Smee and Another CA 28 June 1988 it was held that where a squatter was in possession of a property, the mere sending of a letter by the owner demanding possession did not have the effect of depriving the squatter of possession and transferring it to the owner for the purposes of limitation .| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2426-27 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 54471-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
In Mount Carmel Investments Ltd v Smee and Another CA 28 June 1988 it was held that where a squatter was in possession of a property, the mere sending of a letter by the owner demanding possession did not have the effect of depriving the squatter of possession and transferring it to the owner for the purposes of limitation .