Deletion in charges register
Language: English Series: Independent ; 10 March 1992, 8(1)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: "Norwich and Peterborough Building Society v Steed" CA 5 March 1992. The appellant`s property had been fraudulently conveyed to new owners, who had borrowed on the property. The building society`s charge was entered in the charges register and it was held that the court had no power under Land Registration Act 1925 s82(1) to rectify this against the building society when the appellant`s case of non est factum, in the matter of the transfer, had failed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2811-27 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 55740-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2810-40 Conservation area | WB2810-41 Conservation area | WB2810-43 Planning permission | WB2811-27 Deletion in charges register | WB2811-41 Caravan sites | WB2811-42 Duty of care | WB2811-43 Refusal of planning permission |
"Norwich and Peterborough Building Society v Steed" CA 5 March 1992. The appellant`s property had been fraudulently conveyed to new owners, who had borrowed on the property. The building society`s charge was entered in the charges register and it was held that the court had no power under Land Registration Act 1925 s82(1) to rectify this against the building society when the appellant`s case of non est factum, in the matter of the transfer, had failed.