Caravan sites
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; 1992 EGCS 26(2) (7/3/92)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: "Reigate and Banstead DC v Brown and others"; "Mole Valley DC v Smith and others" CA 27 February 1992. Appeals against injunctions to restrain the use of sites by gypsies were dismissed. It was held that a council`s failure to provide adequate sites for gypsies in breach of statutory duties did not justify a breach of planning law by the gypsies.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2811-41 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 55803-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2810-41 Conservation area | WB2810-43 Planning permission | WB2811-27 Deletion in charges register | WB2811-41 Caravan sites | WB2811-42 Duty of care | WB2811-43 Refusal of planning permission | WB2811-48 Valuation maladministration |
"Reigate and Banstead DC v Brown and others"; "Mole Valley DC v Smith and others" CA 27 February 1992. Appeals against injunctions to restrain the use of sites by gypsies were dismissed. It was held that a council`s failure to provide adequate sites for gypsies in breach of statutory duties did not justify a breach of planning law by the gypsies.