Reviewing rents: hypothesis, reality and commercial purpose
Language: English Series: Rent Review & Lease Renewal ; 12(2) Winter 1991/92, 115-122(8)Publication details: 12(2) Winter 1991/92, 115-122(8)Subject(s):- BASINGSTOKE AND DEANE BC V HOST GROUP LTD
- BRITISH GAS CORPORATION V UNIVERSITIES SUPERANNUATION SCHEME
- EQUITY AND LAW LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY PLC V BODFIELD LTD
- LYNNTHORPE ENTERPRISES LTD V SIDNEY SMITH (CHELSEA) LTD
- NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PLC V ARTHUR YOUNG MCLELLAND MOORES AND CO
- NORWICH UNION LIFE INSURANCE SOCIETY V TRUSTEE SAVINGS BANKS CENTRAL BOARD
- PEARL ASSURANCE PLC V SHAW
- PUGH V SMITHS INDUSTRIES LTD
- RENT REVIEWS
- RITZ HOTEL (LONDON) LTD V RITZ CASINO LTD
- SI PENSION TRUSTEES LTD V MINISTERIO DE MARINA DE LA REPUBLICA PERUANA
- TEA TRADE PROPERTIES LTD V CIN PROPERTIES LTD
- LAW LAND CO LTD V CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION LTD
- TOMLINSON (VO) V PLYMOUTH ARGYLE FOOTBALL CO LTD
- LANDLORD AND TENANT-RENT REVIEWS
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS45924 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 55922-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
With reference to case law, this article examines the purpose of rent reviews, discussing hypothesis v presumption of reality, disregards as to rent and the length of term of the hypothetical lease.