Image from Google Jackets

Graham v Pitkin

Language: English Series: All England Law Reports ; (1992) 2 AllER 235-238(3)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: Privy Council 9 March 1992. It was held that unreasonable delay by the purchaser in completing the contract for the sale of land did not entitle the vendor to rescind the contract without first serving a notice to complete.

Privy Council 9 March 1992. It was held that unreasonable delay by the purchaser in completing the contract for the sale of land did not entitle the vendor to rescind the contract without first serving a notice to complete.