Accommodation not protected
Language: English Series: Independent ; 19 April 1995, 27(1)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: In "Mohamed v Kensington and Chelsea Royal RBC", CA 30 March 1995, it was held that a person who occupied temporary bed and breakfast accommodation in a hotel while the housing authority investigated his application, as a homeless person in priority need, is not entitled to the protection of the Protection from Eviction Act 1977.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3116-65 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 57660-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3116-115 Valuation | WB3116-118 Building society entitled to charge | WB3116-119 Common economic interests | WB3116-65 Accommodation not protected | WB3116-66 Transfer request | WB3116-77 Keeping premises open | WB3116-78 Rent review |
In "Mohamed v Kensington and Chelsea Royal RBC", CA 30 March 1995, it was held that a person who occupied temporary bed and breakfast accommodation in a hotel while the housing authority investigated his application, as a homeless person in priority need, is not entitled to the protection of the Protection from Eviction Act 1977.