No protected tenancy
Language: English Series: Times ; 25 May 1994, 34(1)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: In "O`Sullivan v Barnett and another" CA 19 May 1994, a tenant did not acquire a protected tenancy under Rent Act 1977 s12, where a landlord and family moved from one house to another with an unprotected tenant, even though tenant and the landlord`s son moved into the new house several days in advance of the rest of the family,| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3020-27 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 58375-1001 |
In "O`Sullivan v Barnett and another" CA 19 May 1994, a tenant did not acquire a protected tenancy under Rent Act 1977 s12, where a landlord and family moved from one house to another with an unprotected tenant, even though tenant and the landlord`s son moved into the new house several days in advance of the rest of the family,