Courts loathe to imply terms into contracts
Language: English Series: Chartered Surveyor Weekly ; 39(8) 21 May 1992, 54(1)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: In "Chelsea Football and Athletic Co Ltd v SB Property Co Ltd", the plaintiff`s appeal was dismissed to allow specific performance of the contract in question, and SB`s counterappeal allowed. The CA was unwilling in principle to accept C`s contentions as they would have surpassed the terms of the original contract.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS46469 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 58430-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
In "Chelsea Football and Athletic Co Ltd v SB Property Co Ltd", the plaintiff`s appeal was dismissed to allow specific performance of the contract in question, and SB`s counterappeal allowed. The CA was unwilling in principle to accept C`s contentions as they would have surpassed the terms of the original contract.