Letter did not create tenancy
Language: English Series: Times ; 16 July 1992, LT18(1)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: In "Brent LBC v O`Bryan and others", ChD 6 July 1992, it was held that a letter from a local authority education officer agreeing to the monthly letting of non-residential premises on terms to be laid down by valuers could not be construed as an agreement to grant to the occupier a monthly tenancy.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2828-47 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 59897-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2828-13 Contract terms | WB2828-35 Evidence of non-repair | WB2828-36 Right of entry | WB2828-47 Letter did not create tenancy | WB2828-60 Change of use | WB2828-77 Private use building | WB2828-78 Storage platforms are plant |
In "Brent LBC v O`Bryan and others", ChD 6 July 1992, it was held that a letter from a local authority education officer agreeing to the monthly letting of non-residential premises on terms to be laid down by valuers could not be construed as an agreement to grant to the occupier a monthly tenancy.