Jurisdiction to remit arbitral award limited
Language: English Series: Times ; 30/1/91 p35Publication details: 1991Subject(s): Summary: In King and another v Thomas McKenna Ltd and another , QBD 20 December 1990, it was held that the court`s jurisdiction to remit an arbitral award under Arbitration Act 1950 s22 was unlimited as a safety net to prevent injustice, but not to be used merely to enable the arbitrator to correct errors of judgement or to have second and wiser thoughts.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2705-01 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 60128-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
In King and another v Thomas McKenna Ltd and another , QBD 20 December 1990, it was held that the court`s jurisdiction to remit an arbitral award under Arbitration Act 1950 s22 was unlimited as a safety net to prevent injustice, but not to be used merely to enable the arbitrator to correct errors of judgement or to have second and wiser thoughts.