Unreasonable to prevent credit set-offs
Language: English Series: Contract Journal ; 365(5898) 12 November 1992, 6(1)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: Discusses "Stewart Gill Ltd v Horatio Myer & Co Ltd" 1992, a decision which found that where a term in a contract prevents payment or credit against the price claimed, it is `prima facie` unreasonable and the burden of proving that the term is reasonable for the purpose of the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 s13, rests on the plaintiff.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS47395 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 61810-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Discusses "Stewart Gill Ltd v Horatio Myer & Co Ltd" 1992, a decision which found that where a term in a contract prevents payment or credit against the price claimed, it is `prima facie` unreasonable and the burden of proving that the term is reasonable for the purpose of the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 s13, rests on the plaintiff.