Reservation of shooting and sporting rights
Language: English Series: EGCS ; 1988 137Publication details: 1988Subject(s): Summary: In Inglewood Investment Co Ltd v Forestry Commission , CA 18 October 1988, it was held that the word " deer " was conspicuous by its absence from the reservation . Had the word deer been in the mind of the draftsman of the 1921 indenture he would have used it. Where legislation referred to game such as the Game Act 1831 deer were not included unless they were expressly mentioned.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2444-03 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 62688-1001 |
In Inglewood Investment Co Ltd v Forestry Commission , CA 18 October 1988, it was held that the word " deer " was conspicuous by its absence from the reservation . Had the word deer been in the mind of the draftsman of the 1921 indenture he would have used it. Where legislation referred to game such as the Game Act 1831 deer were not included unless they were expressly mentioned.