Relevant date of occupation
Language: English Series: Times ; 23 July 1992, L&T18(1)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: "Omar Parks Ltd v Elkington"; "Ron Grundy (Melbourne) Ltd v Bonehevo" CA 8 July 1992. The court considered the construction of Mobile Homes Act 1983 schedule 1 para 5 and found that the site owner, in terminating an agreement under this paragraph to position a mobile home on a protected site, must satisfy the court that the occupier is not occupying the home as a sole or main residence at the time of the court hearing as opposed to the time when the owner applies to the court.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2829-36 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 63754-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
"Omar Parks Ltd v Elkington"; "Ron Grundy (Melbourne) Ltd v Bonehevo" CA 8 July 1992. The court considered the construction of Mobile Homes Act 1983 schedule 1 para 5 and found that the site owner, in terminating an agreement under this paragraph to position a mobile home on a protected site, must satisfy the court that the occupier is not occupying the home as a sole or main residence at the time of the court hearing as opposed to the time when the owner applies to the court.