Late decision
Language: English Series: New Builder ; (164) 26 February 1993, 18(1)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: Cites "Balfour Beatty v Chestermount Properties" as example of where a contractor has passed the extended completion date, is causing delay, and is then instructed for a variation which has the effect of delaying completion further. In upholding the arbitrator`s decision in C`s favour, the court ruled that the developer`s architect had the right to grant extensions of time during a period of culpable delay by B, if employing the `net` basis of deductions rather than the `gross`.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS47969 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 64239-1001 |
Cites "Balfour Beatty v Chestermount Properties" as example of where a contractor has passed the extended completion date, is causing delay, and is then instructed for a variation which has the effect of delaying completion further. In upholding the arbitrator`s decision in C`s favour, the court ruled that the developer`s architect had the right to grant extensions of time during a period of culpable delay by B, if employing the `net` basis of deductions rather than the `gross`.