Proprietary estoppel
Language: English Series: EGCS ; (1990) 151 (15/12/90)Publication details: 1990Subject(s): Summary: In J T Developments Ltd v Quinn and another CA 6 December 1990 it was held that the tenants were entitled to a new tenancy by virtue of proprietary estoppel . In a telephone conversation the landlords` agent had stated that a new tenancy would be granted on the same terms as a neigbouring tenant and that statement was an assurance capable of providing the basis for estoppel.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2701-49 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 65199-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2701-46 Collateral contracts | WB2701-47 Ownership of common land | WB2701-48 Motorway repairs without delay | WB2701-49 Proprietary estoppel | WB2701-50 Golf survey | WB2701-51 High rents hit pubs | WB2701-52 Development hassles to stop |
In J T Developments Ltd v Quinn and another CA 6 December 1990 it was held that the tenants were entitled to a new tenancy by virtue of proprietary estoppel . In a telephone conversation the landlords` agent had stated that a new tenancy would be granted on the same terms as a neigbouring tenant and that statement was an assurance capable of providing the basis for estoppel.