Agricultural condition
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; (1995) EGCS 202(1) (7/1/95)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: "Hambleton DC v SoS Environment and others" QBD 2 December 1994. H lost its appeal to prevent occupancy conditions on an agricultural cottage being removed, as within the scope of PPG7 para E18, such conditions limiting residence to someone employed in agriculture or forestry, or their dependants, would not now be required if planning permission was sought.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3102-31 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 66030-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3101-46 Temporary planning permission | WB3101-47 Consent no defence in nuisance | WB3102-17 Eco pioneers go underground | WB3102-31 Agricultural condition | WB3102-32 Contravention notice | WB3102-33 Demolition | WB3102-34 Enforcement notice |
"Hambleton DC v SoS Environment and others" QBD 2 December 1994. H lost its appeal to prevent occupancy conditions on an agricultural cottage being removed, as within the scope of PPG7 para E18, such conditions limiting residence to someone employed in agriculture or forestry, or their dependants, would not now be required if planning permission was sought.