Negligence
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; (1995) EGCS 201(1) (7/1/95)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: "Sneesby and another v Goldings (a firm)" CA 6 December 1994. Chartered surveyors (G) appealed against a charge of negligence in checking for defects while conducting a mortgage valuation survey. G contended that too high a duty was being placed on the surveyor for this kind of report. Appeal dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3102-40 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 66101-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3102-36 Material change | WB3102-37 Planning permission | WB3102-38 Town and country planning costs | WB3102-40 Negligence | WB3102-41 Planning permission | WB3104-21 Too many experts | WB3104-31 Green belt |
"Sneesby and another v Goldings (a firm)" CA 6 December 1994. Chartered surveyors (G) appealed against a charge of negligence in checking for defects while conducting a mortgage valuation survey. G contended that too high a duty was being placed on the surveyor for this kind of report. Appeal dismissed.