Image from Google Jackets

Prodorite Ltd v Clark (VO)

Language: English Series: Rating Appeals ; (1993) RA 197-223(14)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: LT 15 October 1993. P, a ratepayer, was the subject of cpos and was continuing in occupation of the subject premises at a peppercorn rent. The premises` rateable value having been assessed by C at £19,500, P sought a reduction to nil, claiming the state of dereliction in the neighbourhood, poor market demand, impending compulsory purchase and presence of attractive rival sites in nearby Telford and Redditch severely affected its value. LT permitted a reduction by £500 only, accepting C`s argument that there was insufficient evidence that rental values had dropped substantially or that the cpos had yet affected P`s use of the hereditament.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS49879 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 73161-1001

LT 15 October 1993. P, a ratepayer, was the subject of cpos and was continuing in occupation of the subject premises at a peppercorn rent. The premises` rateable value having been assessed by C at £19,500, P sought a reduction to nil, claiming the state of dereliction in the neighbourhood, poor market demand, impending compulsory purchase and presence of attractive rival sites in nearby Telford and Redditch severely affected its value. LT permitted a reduction by £500 only, accepting C`s argument that there was insufficient evidence that rental values had dropped substantially or that the cpos had yet affected P`s use of the hereditament.