Image from Google Jackets

Smith and another v Kent CC

Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; [1995] 44 EG 141-146(6)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: LT 10 February 1995. It was decided that whilst the compulsory purchase of a section of front garden to widen the A20 would not have a serious effect on amenity, the claimants` blight notice was upheld as they would suffer a reduction in privacy from the loss of existing trees and the execution of works would impede pedestrian and vehicular access.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS53955 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 7634-1001

LT 10 February 1995. It was decided that whilst the compulsory purchase of a section of front garden to widen the A20 would not have a serious effect on amenity, the claimants` blight notice was upheld as they would suffer a reduction in privacy from the loss of existing trees and the execution of works would impede pedestrian and vehicular access.