Applicant is put through the mill in land access case
Language: English Series: Property Week ; 53(8) 23 November 1995, 26-27(2)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: Considers the case of "Coulton v Pickles", a dispute over compensation for access to erect scaffolding on neighbouring land to repair a rear wall. The fact that the rear wall belonged to a property that had once been a mill meant that the issue of consideration applied and the neighbours had the right to demand money for inconvenience.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS53978 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 7743-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Considers the case of "Coulton v Pickles", a dispute over compensation for access to erect scaffolding on neighbouring land to repair a rear wall. The fact that the rear wall belonged to a property that had once been a mill meant that the issue of consideration applied and the neighbours had the right to demand money for inconvenience.