Green belt
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; (1995) EGCS 2(1) (21/1/95)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: "Houghton v SoS Environment and another" QBD 12 January 1995. An application for planning permission for a garden, private tennis court and pavilion in metropolitan green belt was refused, but challenged on the construction of `outdoor sport` listed as an exception in the planning guidance. "Held" that though `outdoor sport` was not limited to public sport, the inspector`s error was not a material consideration. Appeal dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3104-31 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 75155-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3102-40 Negligence | WB3102-41 Planning permission | WB3104-21 Too many experts | WB3104-31 Green belt | WB3104-36 Negligence: valuation | WB3104-38 Fixtures and fittings | WB3105-19 Council must help tenant |
"Houghton v SoS Environment and another" QBD 12 January 1995. An application for planning permission for a garden, private tennis court and pavilion in metropolitan green belt was refused, but challenged on the construction of `outdoor sport` listed as an exception in the planning guidance. "Held" that though `outdoor sport` was not limited to public sport, the inspector`s error was not a material consideration. Appeal dismissed.