Mount Charlotte Investments plc v Prudential Assurance
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1995) 10 EG 129-132(4)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: ChD 12 July 1994. An arbitrator, in determining a rent review, failed to follow his own instructions setting out what evidence of comparables would be taken as admissible. M, the tenant, objected and applied to the court for an extension of time and, under the Arbitration Act 1950 ss22 or 23, set aside or remit the award because of the arbitrator`s misconduct. Application granted, the court holding that there was misconduct, and the award set aside.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS52393 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 75785-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
ChD 12 July 1994. An arbitrator, in determining a rent review, failed to follow his own instructions setting out what evidence of comparables would be taken as admissible. M, the tenant, objected and applied to the court for an extension of time and, under the Arbitration Act 1950 ss22 or 23, set aside or remit the award because of the arbitrator`s misconduct. Application granted, the court holding that there was misconduct, and the award set aside.