Felling trees without licence
Language: English Series: EGCS ; 1989 96Publication details: 1989Subject(s): Summary: In Forestry Commission v Frost and another QBD 27 June 1989 the respondent failed to apply for a felling licence yet continued to fell trees on property for which he had a licence to use and occupy but on which he had no interest or estate. The word "anyone" had to be defined as referring to anyone under Forestry Act 1967 s 17 or anyone with interest or estate in the land under s10. Appeal allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2527-02 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 75856-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2526-34 VAT changes | WB2526-35 Concessions won on Water Bill | WB2527-01 The new farm owners | WB2527-02 Felling trees without licence | WB2527-03 Channel Tunnel | WB2527-04 Danish construction market | WB2527-05 Housing cost index set to rise |
In Forestry Commission v Frost and another QBD 27 June 1989 the respondent failed to apply for a felling licence yet continued to fell trees on property for which he had a licence to use and occupy but on which he had no interest or estate. The word "anyone" had to be defined as referring to anyone under Forestry Act 1967 s 17 or anyone with interest or estate in the land under s10. Appeal allowed.