Central Estates Ltd v SoS Environment
Language: English Series: Rent Review & Lease Renewal ; 15(4) 1995, 73-86(14)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: CA 23 June 1995. A notice to announce a rent review for the third perid should have been served no later than 29 September 1991, but landlords purported to have issued a notice dated 14 April 1992. The High Court found the notice valid, but tenants appealed. Appeal allowed on basis that `time was of the essence`.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS54026 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 7948-1001 |
CA 23 June 1995. A notice to announce a rent review for the third perid should have been served no later than 29 September 1991, but landlords purported to have issued a notice dated 14 April 1992. The High Court found the notice valid, but tenants appealed. Appeal allowed on basis that `time was of the essence`.