Magistrate`s jurisdiction
Language: English Series: Independent ; July 1994, 15(1)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: "Hackney LBC v Mott and Fairman" QBD 8 June 1994. The ratepayers were not informed within the proper time period of an alteration to the valuation list and they claimed the entry in the list was invalid. H sought a liability order. In deciding the issue of the liability order, the magistrate had no jurisdiction to determine validity of an entry in the non-domestic rating list.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3026-48 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 81032-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3026-34 Possession | WB3026-42 Enforcement notice | WB3026-43 Use of listed building | WB3026-48 Magistrate`s jurisdiction | WB3027-20 Effectiveness of noise notice continues | WB3027-31 Break clause | WB3027-32 Method of assessing fair rents |
"Hackney LBC v Mott and Fairman" QBD 8 June 1994. The ratepayers were not informed within the proper time period of an alteration to the valuation list and they claimed the entry in the list was invalid. H sought a liability order. In deciding the issue of the liability order, the magistrate had no jurisdiction to determine validity of an entry in the non-domestic rating list.