Titterell v Tunbridge Wells BC
Language: English Series: Property, planning & compensation reports ; [1997] 74 P&CR 337-342(6)Publication details: 1997Subject(s): Summary: CA 4 December 1996. T served a blight notice on TWBC after his land was included in the green belt. They served a counter-notice and T referred the issue to the LT. LT decided that designation of the land as green belt did not render it as blighted within the meaning of Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s149(1) and sch13. T appealed by way of case stated from LT decision. He also submitted that the land was not lawfully designated as part of the Green Belt. Appeal dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS57806 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 81746-1001 |
CA 4 December 1996. T served a blight notice on TWBC after his land was included in the green belt. They served a counter-notice and T referred the issue to the LT. LT decided that designation of the land as green belt did not render it as blighted within the meaning of Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s149(1) and sch13. T appealed by way of case stated from LT decision. He also submitted that the land was not lawfully designated as part of the Green Belt. Appeal dismissed.