Railtrack plc v Gojra and Gojra
Language: English Series: New Property Cases ; (1997) NPC 166, (2)Publication details: 1997Subject(s): Summary: CA 28 November 1997. A tenant who has served a notice under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 on a landlord who had been superseded and replaced under a privatisation scheme is held to have served it on that landlord as agent of the successor. Having served a valid notice and not pursued it, the tenant is unable to serve a fresh notice. NB NOT TO BE PHOTOCOPIED.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X88123 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 82506-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
CA 28 November 1997. A tenant who has served a notice under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 on a landlord who had been superseded and replaced under a privatisation scheme is held to have served it on that landlord as agent of the successor. Having served a valid notice and not pursued it, the tenant is unable to serve a fresh notice. NB NOT TO BE PHOTOCOPIED.